Running cost budgets are a “piggy bank”
One of the most common misconceptions about novated leases is how running costs budgeting and claiming actually work.
People often think:
- the novated lease company is charging them,
- or that there’s some fixed amount they are forced to spend,
- or that unused money somehow disappears.
None of that is true.
Running costs budgeting in a novated lease is best thought of as a piggy bank funded with your pre-tax income.
Over- or under-budgeting running costs at the beginning does not, by itself, create losses at the conclusion of the lease. 1
What you give the leasing company at the start: just a budget
At the beginning of a novated lease, what you tell the leasing company is not a bill and not a commitment.
It is simply a budget.
That budget might be based on:
- kilometres driven,
- servicing,
- insurance,
- tyres,
- charging,
- etc.
For example, if you tell them you expect to drive 25,000 km per year, and you’re using the ATO 4.2c/km method:
- 25,000 × $0.042 = $1,050 per year
That translates to:
- $1,050 ÷ 26 fortnights ≈ $40.39 per fortnight
Each fortnight, what actually happens is very simple:
The novated lease company takes $40.39 of your pre-tax income and sets it aside.
That’s it.
No spending has happened yet.
When you make a claim
Over time, this pot of money slowly grows.
You can think of it literally as a pre-tax piggy bank.
At some point, you decide to claim.
Say after one quarter, you submit two odometer photos showing:
“I’ve driven 6,000 km since the last claim.”
They then do the arithmetic:
- 6,000 × $0.042 = $252
They:
- open the piggy bank,
- take $252 out,
- and send it to your bank account.
That’s it. No interest is charged on the running costs.
Under-budgeting and over-budgeting are not a big deal
Because this is just a budget, it is very common to get it wrong at the beginning.
And it really doesn’t matter much.
If you under-budget
If you find that:
- you’re driving more than expected, or
- you have an unexpectedly large claim (e.g. a flat tyre costing $400), and
- your piggy bank isn’t keeping up,
you can simply ask the novated lease company to:
- increase the ongoing contribution,
- do a one-off top-up, or
- spread the adjustment over several pays.
If you over-budget
If you end the lease with money still sitting in the piggy bank:
- that money is not lost,
- it is refunded to you.
Because it flows back through payroll, it will be taxed at that point (as normal income), but economically it is still your money.
Over-budgeting just means you temporarily parked too much pre-tax money in the piggy bank.
Importantly, the over-budgeted running costs can't be used to pay down the residual value of the car, as this has to be paid with post-tax dollars.
What running costs are not
Running costs are not:
- a fee you are forced to spend,
- a loan,
- something that attracts interest,
- money the novated lease company keeps if you don’t use it.
They are simply pre-tax money set aside and reimbursed later.
When the wrong budget becomes practically problematic
While under- or over-budgeting running costs is mechanically harmless, it can become problematic in one specific way:
when people start treating the running-cost budget as if it were the true cost of owning the car.
This usually happens like this:
- someone sets an unrealistically low running-cost budget at the start (whether by themselves or using default figures by the novated lease provider),
- their take-home pay looks great,
- and they mentally anchor to that number as “what the car costs me”.
This is the same anchoring error discussed in why “tax saved” is misleading.
For a while, everything feels fine because the piggy bank is quietly being under-funded relative to reality.
The issue only appears later, when they need to use the money and find that they don't have enough.
When reality forces a correction
Eventually, one of the following happens:
- higher-than-expected mileage,
- an expensive service or tyre replacement,
- rising insurance premium etc.
At that point, the novated lease company will require the budget to be corrected via:
- higher ongoing deductions,
- a lump-sum top-up,
- or a combination of both.
People often experience this as:
“My novated lease suddenly got more expensive.”
It is important to note that this is an expectation problem, not a novated lease problem.
The same issue would have arisen if you bought the car upfront thinking that the insurance premium would always be $1,500 per year, only to be shocked when it rose to $2,000 the next year.
If someone has mentally committed to a car based on an unrealistically low running-cost budget, the later correction can feel painful.
A practical takeaway
A sensible approach is to:
- set a realistic running-cost budget upfront,
- treat it as a planning estimate rather than a promise,
- and understand that later adjustments are not penalties but simply reconciliation.
People should anchor their novated-lease calculations primarily on the vehicle cost component, since that is the fixed financial cost determined upfront. Running costs should be treated as a separate, variable consideration.
The novated lease calculator separates vehicle costs from running costs for this exact reason.
Key takeaway
If you remember nothing else:
Running costs in a novated lease are just a pre-tax piggy bank.
You estimate → money gets set aside → you claim what you actually use.
If you get the estimate wrong, you adjust it as you go.
Support this independent calculator & guide
This calculator and guide are built and continuously maintained as an independent project.
If it has helped you think more clearly, avoid a costly mistake, or saved you meaningful money, you’re welcome to support its ongoing maintenance and improvements:
- Using my Tesla referral link for a $350 discount if you’re ordering a Tesla, or
- Buying me a cuppa ☕ to help cover hosting, development time, and future improvements.
-
In theory, significant and prolonged over-budgeting can carry a small opportunity cost. For example, if $10,000 sat in the running-cost “piggy bank” for an extended period, that money (post tax) could otherwise have reduced a home loan offset balance and saved some interest. For most people and typical budgeting errors, this effect is minor. ↩