Skip to content

The ATO 4.2c/km EV charging shortcut — how it actually works

EV charging sounds simple until you try to claim it.

Different electricity tariffs, solar vs grid, time-of-use pricing, free public chargers, workplace chargers, battery losses… it quickly becomes a record-keeping nightmare.

Recognising this, the ATO essentially said: this is getting ridiculous.

So instead of forcing everyone to track the cost of every kWh, they introduced a simplified shortcut method.

What is the 4.2c/km shortcut?

Under PCG 2024/2, the ATO allows EV owners to claim home charging costs at a flat rate of:

4.2 cents per kilometre driven

This applies to home charging, and it is:

  • based purely on odometer readings
  • completely independent of
    • your electricity tariff,
    • when you charge,
    • how much solar you use,
    • how much free charging you get elsewhere.

In other words:

When it comes to claiming home charging expense, the ATO does not care how you actually charged the car. They only care how far you drove it.

This makes the method simple, cheap to comply with, and very predictable.

Important: this is not a cash reimbursement

A very common misunderstanding is this:

“If I claim 10,000 km, I get $420 back.”

That is not how it works.

The 4.2c/km amount behaves like a tax deduction, not a cash reimbursement.

Example

If you drive 10,000 km in a year:

  • Claim amount:
    10,000 × $0.042 = $420

That $420 is added to your deductions.

Your actual benefit depends on your marginal tax rate.

For someone on 30% tax + 2% Medicare levy:

  • Net benefit = $420 × 32% = $134.40

So you are not being paid $420; you are reducing your tax bill by $134.40.

The counter-intuitive bit: you can make a net financial gain from charging and driving

Because the claim is distance-based, not cost-based, something interesting can happen.

If you charge your EV very cheaply — for example:

  • heavy solar usage,
  • very cheap off-peak tariffs (e.g. 8c/kWh),
  • or a mix of free charging

then the actual electricity cost of driving those kilometres can be lower than the tax benefit you receive from the 4.2c/km deduction.

In that situation, the net effect is that:

you can make a net financial gain from charging your EV.

This feels wrong intuitively, but it is simply a consequence of the shortcut being deliberately conservative and administratively simple.

This does not eliminate other novated-lease risks, but nevertheless is an interesting "perk" of EV novated lease.

Example

If you drive 15,000 km in a year and are on top marginal tax bracket (45+2%):

  • Claim amount:
    15,000 × $0.042 = $630

Your car has an average efficiency of 150Wh/km, and you charge your car on a cheap tariff of 8c/kWh.

  • Actual electricity expense: 15,000 x 0.15 x $0.08 = $180

When you claim the $630,

  • Tax refund = $630 × 47% = $296.10

Once you reconcile with your actual expense, post-claiming you have made $116.10 profit from charging the car.

The calculations above are automatically performed in the Detail - Basic Information - Annual Electricty Report, under Post-Reimbursement Effective Charging Expense figure.

Myth-busting: "If I charge mostly for free, I shouldn’t claim electricity"

A common mistake is to remove or minimise the electricity claim (e.g. "$50 per month for charging") on the assumption that "I charge mostly for free on solar / work, so why would I include this cost?"

This is a mathematical error caused by misunderstanding the mechanics.

When you "budget $50 per month" for EV charging under a novated lease, you are not spending $50. You are instead setting aside $50 of gross (pre-tax) income that is sheltered from income tax.

If your actual charging cost is low (or close to zero), you still keep the tax benefit of that claim — which results in a net financial gain, as demonstrated in the examples above.

In practice, this means you should almost never skip the electricity claim, even if you charge very cheaply or for free. Doing so simply leaves money on the table.

The only realistic exception would be if claiming electricity incurs additional administrative costs that outweighs the financial benefit. This does not appear to apply for most major novated lease providers.

The three ways you can claim EV charging

If you read PCG 2024/2 carefully, there are three permissible approaches.

1. Use 4.2c/km for distance driven

This is the simplest and most common method.

As discussed above, you:

  • record odometer readings,
  • calculate the distance driven,
  • claim 4.2c/km for that distance.

If you choose this approach, you can't claim any commercial charger cost that you have incurred.

2. Claim only commercial charging invoices

If you use commercial chargers often, you can instead:

  • keep invoices from public / commercial chargers,
  • claim the actual dollar amounts paid.

If you choose this approach, you can't claim any home charging.

3. Mixed method (home charging + commercial charging)

This is the least common, but sometimes most beneficial, and it’s the method I personally use some years.

It is also the most record-keeping-intensive approach, and only worthwhile if the additional deduction meaningfully exceeds the extra effort.

You can do this only if:

  • your vehicle can reliably report how much charging occurred at home vs elsewhere, and
  • you keep proper records i.e. odometer reading for the period covering each FBT year i.e. 1 April to 31 March

Note that EV charging claims follow the FBT year (1 April – 31 March), not the income tax year.

The method works like this:

  • home charging distance → claimed at 4.2c/km (pro-rated based on charging ratio),
  • commercial charging → claimed using actual invoices.

The home charging to commercial charging ratio is derived from the energy split (kWh charged at home as a proportion of total charging).

Depending on:

  • your home electricity cost,
  • solar usage,
  • commercial charging mix,
  • and any free charging you get,

this mixed approach can result in a higher total deduction than using the shortcut alone.

Example:

From the period 1/4/2023 to 31/3/2024, an EV has driven 12,418km. According to the Tesla app, over this period, 1,447 kWh is charged at home out of 2,432 kWh total, which is 59.5%.

This means we can apportion the 12,418km to:

  • 7,389km (59.5%) charged at home
  • the rest charged elsewhere.

We then use the 4.2c/km rule to calculate the home portion charging expense, alongside all the commercial charging invoices in this time period, and claim both amounts.

Why the ATO did it this way

The 4.2c/km shortcut is not meant to be perfectly accurate.

It is meant to be:

  • simple,
  • cheap to comply with,
  • and good enough for most people.

The ATO explicitly chose administrative simplicity over precision.

If your real costs are lower, you benefit. If your real costs are higher, you wear the difference.

The key takeaway

If you remember nothing else:

The 4.2c/km method is a tax deduction, not a reimbursement, and it is deliberately blind to how you actually charge your car.

For those with solar or cheap tariffs, it is surprisingly generous.

For others, more precise methods may make sense, but only if you are willing and able to do the record-keeping.

Reference

Support this independent calculator & guide

This calculator and guide are built and continuously maintained as an independent project.

If it has helped you think more clearly, avoid a costly mistake, or saved you meaningful money, you’re welcome to support its ongoing maintenance and improvements: